On this page
Le maillage interne est le levier de classement le moins cher que la plupart des PME ignorent. Voici l'architecture hub-and-spoke que nous déployons sur chaque site — et la règle des trois liens qui force l'autorité thématique à se composer.
- 01Three inbound, three outbound — the contextual-link-count sweet spot.
- 02Hub-and-spoke architecture forces every post into a topical cluster.
- 03Orphan pages bleed authority — audit for them monthly.
- 04Anchor text is a topical signal. Varied, descriptive, specific.
- 05Navigation links don't count. Contextual links from body copy do.
Why internal linking is the cheapest compounding lever in SEO
Internal links do three things at once. They pass PageRank from strong pages to weak pages (the topology argument). They tell Google and LLMs what your site is authoritative about (the topical-signal argument). And they increase the crawl frequency of every linked page (the freshness argument). Almost nothing else in SEO does all three simultaneously, and almost nothing else costs as little to ship.
If you've already read SEO that actually ranks, treat this post as the operational layer underneath. Internal linking is the physical plumbing that makes topical authority actually compound — not a theoretical add-on.
The hub-and-spoke architecture
We ship the same architecture on every SME site. Three to five hub pages, each owning one primary topic. Every blog post is a spoke, linked to its hub and 2–3 sibling spokes. Every hub is linked from the main navigation.
This is not just taxonomy — it's a physical link graph. A hub with 15 spokes is a far stronger ranking surface than 15 disconnected posts, even if the word count is identical. Google treats a tightly linked cluster as a single authoritative entity; a loose collection of posts as noise.
- Hub — a long-form pillar page targeting the primary keyword
- Spokes — 8–20 supporting posts, each targeting a long-tail variation
- Navigation — every hub linked from the top nav or footer
- Cross-spoke links — every spoke links to 2–3 sibling spokes inside its cluster
Anchor text: the signal most sites waste
Google and LLM retrieval layers both treat anchor text as a direct topical signal. A link that says "generative engine optimization" is a stronger vote for that topic than a link that says "click here" — and yet most sites use the same generic anchors everywhere.
The discipline is three rules: descriptive (the anchor text describes what the reader will find), specific (exact-match when natural, variations when repeated), and varied (don't use the same anchor for the same destination on every page — it looks manipulative). These same patterns make your content more citeable by LLMs, because retrieval layers use anchor text to cluster concepts.
Questions about this topic
01How many internal links should a blog post have?
Three contextual inbound links (from other posts pointing in) and 2–4 contextual outbound links (to related posts). Fewer than that and the post is topologically weak; more than about six outbound and you're diluting the anchor-text signal.
02What is an orphan page?
A page with zero internal links pointing to it. Google eventually discovers it via the sitemap, but crawl frequency is extremely low and it accrues almost no PageRank. Orphan pages are the silent bleed most SME audits miss.
03Does anchor text still matter?
Yes, more than most people think. Exact-match anchor text is a direct topical signal to both Google and LLM retrieval layers. The rule: descriptive, specific, and varied — never "click here" or "learn more."
Writes about revenue systems, SME conversion, and the unglamorous ops work that compounds.